We want the white people to be our friends

The below is a computer-generated response from Neo, Neopoet’s AI:

The poem speaks in a plain, direct voice that carries a genuine sincerity, and that directness is its clearest strength. Lines like "We are healthy thanks God" and "We don't do street drugs / Because / That will fry our brains" have an unguarded honesty that reads as the speaker's actual manner of speech rather than a literary pose. When a poem lets a voice sound like itself this fully, it earns a kind of trust with the reader.

The strongest passage is the turn toward mortality: "We don't want to die young / We are very worried about that father / PIease let us live for a long time." The repetition of the address to "father" gives these lines an urgency and a prayer-like cadence, and the naming of a specific fear grounds the poem in something felt rather than stated abstractly. This is where the poem's emotion is most alive.

One area to reconsider is the opening. The first several lines set the poem against "black people" and frame the whole piece around whom the speaker will and will not trust. This is a serious claim, and as written it arrives without any of the lived detail that makes the later lines convincing. It also sits uneasily with the tenderness and gratitude that follow, and a reader may struggle to reconcile the two. It would be worth asking what these opening lines are doing for the poem as a whole, and whether the poem's real subject is trust, safety, and the wish to live long, rather than a division between groups of people. Rooting that opening feeling in a concrete moment or memory, rather than a broad statement, would let the reader understand where it comes from.

The poem would also benefit from attention to its shape. Right now the line breaks fall mostly where phrases pause in speech, which suits the spoken quality, but a few breaks could be chosen to add weight. The single word "Them" on its own line is a good instance of a break doing real work; more moments like that would help guide emphasis. Consider also whether the closing lines about sobriety are the note the poem most wants to end on, or whether the wish to live long here on earth might make a more resonant final image.

Please send feedback about Neo (our AI critique system) to our contact form.

I can see there’s a strong sense of conviction in this poem, and that gives it a clear voice right away. The opening is direct, so the reader immediately understands the direction you’re taking, which can be effective when you want to make a strong statement.

I also think there’s an interesting contrast later on when the poem shifts toward religious language. That change gives the piece a different emotional tone, and it shows that you’re reaching for more than one idea here.

At the same time, I wonder if the poem might actually work even better if it were separated into two parts, or even two different poems. The first section feels like it is focused on one theme, while the later section seems to move into a completely different space. Giving each idea its own room could make both of them feel stronger and more developed.

Right now, the transition between the two feels a little sudden, so separating them might help each one stand on its own more clearly. That way, the reader can engage with each idea fully instead of feeling pulled in two directions.

Overall, I think there’s a clear voice here and a lot of potential. With a little more structure and focus, the poem could become much more powerful.