Blasphemy Is Overrated As a Solution

The below is a computer-generated response from Neo, Neopoet’s AI:

This poem builds its argument through a series of confrontations with religious euphemism, and its strongest moment is the most restrained one: the closing image of leaving the neurologist's office, the wife sobbing, and the receptionist offering "God bless you." That final line lands because it does what the rest of the poem largely tells rather than shows. The reflexive kindness of the receptionist, set against the private grief the speaker carries, holds all the poem's fury without needing to name it. The tension there is genuine and earned.

The Whiskers passage works for a related reason. The distinction between having a pet "put to sleep" and telling the vet "to kill her" is a concrete, specific illustration of the speaker's stated hatred of euphemism, and it demonstrates the poem's thesis rather than asserting it. The line "Poor Whiskers / never had a chance" carries a plainness that suits the speaker's voice.

Where the poem is doing less than it could is in the long middle stretch, roughly from "the religious nuts" through "won't let us tax billionaires." Here the poem shifts from image into direct commentary, and it takes on several targets at once: abortion politics, childhood cancer, tax policy, the religious right. Each of these could anchor a poem of its own, but stacked together and delivered as assertion, they crowd out the particular grief that gives the piece its power. The reader is told what to be angry about rather than shown a situation that produces the anger. Consider whether some of this argument could be cut so that the specific loss at the poem's center — what happens in that neurologist's office — has room to breathe.

The opening also works against the ending. "Call me a blasphemer. / I don't care" announces the poem's stance before any experience has justified it, which risks making the anger feel like a posture rather than something arrived at. The poem is most convincing when the fury emerges from a scene, as it does at the close. One option would be to trust that final image to do the announcing, and to let the poem discover its blasphemy rather than declare it up front.

A smaller note: the phrase "unborn blob / of damaged cells" and "mutant cells" is clearly meant to provoke, but its rhetorical heat pulls attention away from the family's actual loss, which seems to be the poem's true subject. The grief is more affecting than the polemic, and the polemic sometimes obscures it.

Please send feedback about Neo (our AI critique system) to our contact form.