How can you criticize outrage when the First Lady of the United States wears a jacket with that message visiting people in such distress Have you no soul, sir? Or are you so inamoured with this president you have lost it?

you can google about it. With all the news of course you can't get involved with all the stuff going on in the USA. You probably heard of our boarder crises and how it evolved to our agents separating families at the detention centers, babies, toddlers and teens, right now about 20,000 in makeshift centers around the country. Our government will not allow in the press, but some pictures have gotten out showing kids in cages. It is a humanitarian crises unlike any we've had since WWII with the Japanese... There was immediate outrage, protests, marches etc., and finally it was learned the first lady, Melania, would fly to Texas to see first hand how the children were being kept. First ladies in the USA has recently played an important function as an ambassador. So she actually boarded the plane and returned home wearing a cheap outer jacket with those exact words screen printed boldly on the back, clear for all the cameras. (in lower case like the title) At first, nobody could believe it, it's like wearing an I'm with Stupid t shirt to a funeral. The visit to the facility was poorly handed, but the main message about the trip as just mind blowing. Her aids said, "it's only a jacket" and "it was a fashion statement" or tried to deflect it. So the poem is about how we wanted to think this woman had a real heart, and would add to the compassion and make action swifter. There is no forgiving this, she is now as beloved as Antoinette was in the French Revolution. She earned it herself.
You can see the problem we have in the US. One side, Mr Scribble, and the rest of Populesque Trumpius, can see no wrong doing by their fascist in chief, or his family who have a national presence, especially his wife. The other side continues to watch decency reach new lows everyday. I hope things are better down under. But from what i can see, man we all have problems
trying to find intelligent and compassionate governments.

2,000 was the number the government is telling us, of which 1500 are most recent since the zero policy was put in. Nobody knows exactly how many were abandoned as you say, but the number is very small. People don't do that, except in situations of life and death. In the case of WWII we cannot forget 2000 Jewish children were turned back from Europe, basically due to Roosevelt's anit-semitism, and just about all of them died in the camps.
The pictures are now very much the present, the kids are basically imprisoned there. In a country that welcomes the immigrant, like my grandparents, i do not consider his immigration policy in any way shape or form humane. He wants to keep the filth out- i.e., anybody other than white Christian's with degrees from oxford. We need immigrant labor here for gods sake, not Phd's to take the better jobs away. The immigrants pick the cotton, clean the toilets. Their kids become lawyers and doctors.They do not take away jobs from us, until the robots can do it, who's going to watch mom who needs 24 hour help. Hilde from Denmark? our population can handle the small amount of immigrants from Salvador compared to the problem Europe has. And give up with the criminal bullshit, undocumented immigrants were responsible for less than 3% crime. Just like most terrorist acts are not by Muslims. Finally the comparing of family dysfunction and asylum seekers is not the same. That sounds like Hannity logic.
I'll stay in my bubble. If this guy can convince you it doesn't matter, lying is a fine, about just about everything starting from the first day with inauguration, over 2000 times, (but it's ok every body does it,) rabble rousing doesn't matter, using the office for personal gain like in a banana republic level doesn't bother you, let's just drop it.